Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02499
Original file (BC 2014 02499.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02499

			COUNSEL:  NONE

			HEARING DESIRED:  NO 


APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of 
Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to include the award of the 
following Air Force Medals and/or Ribbons:

      a. Presidential Unit Citation (PUC), with one Oak Leaf 
Cluster. 
      
      b.  Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA), with two Oak 
Leaf Clusters. 
      
      c.  Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon (SAEMR).


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His records do not accurately capture all authorized Air Force 
Medals and/or Ribbons.

In support of his request, the applicant provided copies of his 
DD 215, Correction to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or 
Discharge from Active Duty, dated 2 Jun 13 and  copies of 
Training Certificates and photos from various locations. 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 11 Aug 
69.

On 7 Jul 72, the applicant was furnished an Honorable discharge, 
and was credited with 2 years, 10 months, and 27 days of active 
service.   

The applicant’s DD Form 214 and subsequent DD Form 215s reflect 
the award of the following Air Force Medals and/or Ribbons:

	- National Defense Service Medal
	- Vietnam Service Medal with two Bronze Service Stars
	- Air Force Good Conduct Medal
	- Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of 
primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.    


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of 
an error or an injustice.  

They recommend the Board disapprove the award of the PUC with 
one Bronze Oak Leaf Cluster as they were unable to verify any 
units the applicant served with that were awarded the PUC.  

They also recommend the Board disapprove the award of the two 
Bronze Oak Leaf Clusters to the AFOUA.  They were able to 
verify the basic award for service with the 100th 
Organizational Maintenance Squadron; however, they were 
unable to verify additional units the applicant served with 
that were awarded the AFOUA; rending the applicant ineligible 
for award of the Bronze Oak Leaf Clusters.   

Finally, they recommend the Board disapprove award of the 
SAEMR.  There is no official documentation in the applicant's 
official personnel records verifying he qualified as expert 
with either the M-16 rifle or issue handgun to be eligible for 
award.

They were able to determine that the below Air Force Medal 
and/or Ribbon should have been awarded during the applicant’s 
service from 11 Aug 69 to 7 Jul 72 and was not reflected in his 
records:

	- Air Force Outstanding Unit Award

Upon final board decision, administrative correction of the 
applicant’s official military personnel record will be completed 
by AFPC/DPSOR.

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 17 Nov 14 for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been received by 
this office.




THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion 
that relief beyond that already granted administratively is not 
warranted.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the 
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested 
relief.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-02499 in Executive Session on 28 Apr 15 under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	, Panel Chair
	, Member
	, Member

The following documentary evidence pertaining AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-02499 was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 14 Jun 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSID, dated 22 Sep 14.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Nov 14.
					






Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03611

    Original file (BC 2014 03611.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03611 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect that he received the following awards and ribbons: 1. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03890

    Original file (BC-2012-03890.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03890 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect he was awarded the following: a. Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He served in Guam with the 3960th Strategic Wing for 176...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05444

    Original file (BC 2013 05444.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Vietnam Service Medal with a Silver Service Star (VSM w/SSS) Army Noncommissioned Officer Professional Development Ribbon Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon with one Bronze Service Star (SAEMR w/1BSS) Air Force Training Ribbon (AFTR) ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He is authorized the requested awards and it is unclear as to why the awards from his original DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00463

    Original file (BC 2014 00463.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00463 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, issued in conjunction with his 31 Aug 83 retirement, in Item 13, Decoration, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, be corrected to add the following awards and decorations: 1. DPSID determined that the below Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03600

    Original file (BC 2014 03600.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, the Air Force will not include the Vietnam location on his DD Form 214. We have thoroughly reviewed the evidence of record and considered the weight and relevance of the additional documentation provided by the applicant, and whether or not it was discoverable at the time of any previous application. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the additional evidence presented did not meet the criteria for reconsideration by the Board; and the application will only be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03108

    Original file (BC 2014 03108.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on his dates in Vietnam, DPSID was able to verify he is authorized two Bronze Service Stars (BSS) to the VSM for his participation in the Vietnam Defensive Campaign and Vietnam Air Campaign. Campaign streamers are embroidered swallow-tailed ribbons of the same design as campaign or service medals awarded to members for service in a named campaign. Based on review of the applicant’s official military personnel record, DPSID was able to determine that the below Air Force Medals and/or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00319

    Original file (BC 2014 00319.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00319 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be updated to reflect all awards and medals while assigned to 3rd Air Division and 269th Combat Aviation Battalion. The applicant’s DD Form 214, reflect the following Air Force Medals and/or Ribbons: - National Defense Service...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02385

    Original file (BC 2014 02385.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02385 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. His DD 214 was administratively corrected to reflect seven months and nine days of foreign service. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03049

    Original file (BC 2014 03049.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The SAEMR is awarded to all Air Force service members who, after 1 Jan 63, qualified as “expert” in small arms marksmanship with either the M-16 rifle or issued handgun. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID notes the applicant’s entitlement RVGC w/P, AFLSA, AFOUA, PUC, Vietnam Service Medal with four Bronze...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01956

    Original file (BC 2014 01956.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request for award of the PUC w/1BOLC, indicating while they were able to verify the basic award of the PUC for the applicant’s service with the 19th Air Commando Squadron (ACS), re-designated as the 19th Special Operations Squadron (SOS), he was not assigned to the unit during the second PUC award inclusive period of 1 Apr 70 to 30 Jun 70. A review of the...